Sentiment Craters

The S&P 500 is only about 4% off its all-time high and yet bearish sentiment is nearing historic levels. The stock market gains over the last four and a half months have been erased as investors reduce their exposure to many risk assets in the US and take money off the table. The Bull-Bear spread, as it’s called, has only been lower 10 times in the last 30 years. Historically, returns over the ensuing 6-12 months are quite robust, with an average gain of 22% after one year. Only once were they lower, and that was by a miniscule 0.35%. Sentiment readings at this level are what you would expect to see during major market bottoms, not near all-time highs.

It’s hard to pinpoint exactly why investors are so bearish when overall investment performance has been strong, but there are some sensible reasons to point to also. For one, portfolios really haven’t budged much in the last 6 months. Technology companies have been on a historic run over the past few years and now they make up a hefty weighting in the indices and in individual portfolios. So when they stall, the market typically stalls too. Nvidia, for example, shot up 300% from the start of last year into summer, but has since taken a well-deserved breather and is trading at essentially the same price, and it makes up nearly 8% of the Nasdaq 100 index. Their earnings are still growing at a phenomenal rate and even after their meteoric rise NVDA is trading at a cheaper earnings multiple than Apple, so another leg higher (especially after the recent sell-off) could be coming. Another reason for pessimism is all the tariff talks. Whether tariffs are good or bad for an economy is debatable. Regardless of the outcome, big policy changes like these take years to work their way through the system but businesses must adapt quickly. In the short term, major policy changes disrupt business plans and throw chaos into the markets. Imagine being a manufacturer and suddenly a key part doubles in price due to a new tax or is no longer allowed to be imported. Chaos. This could be why we are seeing such strength in markets abroad. Dollars are chasing relative certainty.

Outside of the US, global equities are on a tear. Asia, Europe, and Latin America are all outperforming US markets. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing for US equities. It just shows that breadth is still expanding and now it’s not just new US sectors participating in the bull market but global equities as well. We have discussed sector rotation and breadth expansion in the past here. Rotation is the lifeblood of a bull market and breadth expansion signifies its health. We are seeing more and more stocks participating in the 3yr old bull market. Simply because we are experiencing a bit of a stall and pull-back in US equities does not mean that the bull market is canceled here. We would need to see much more confirming evidence first. An expansion in the list of stocks making new lows versus new highs, for example. The number of stocks that have declined by 20% from their highs is creeping up (to levels not seen since November of 2023), but still nowhere near critical levels. As investors, we might be a little more cautious today than we were a few weeks or months ago, but we are still looking for more things to buy rather than to sell. And with breadth expanding it is presenting us with new opportunities to capture growth. Developed markets have done the best, markets like Germany and Italy. Some of these international indices are bumping up against all-time highs not seen since before the financial crisis of 2008. China and emerging markets have also been on the move, though are much further from their former highs. However, if this trend is going to continue and we are going to see more countries breaking out to new highs, then the dollar will likely have to weaken. Weak dollars make foreign investments more valuable here. A US investor will receive more dollars back if the investment they hold overseas has a strengthening local currency. But a weakening dollar is also a tailwind for US equities since so many of our companies derive much of their business from outside the US. So, if the dollar continues to weaken (as it has done steadily over the last few months) this would bode well for equities in general and might finally be the kicker that boots global stocks back into favor, even if sentiment here in the US remains in the doldrums.

Solid Start

After mostly negative returns for December the markets have rebounded with a solid start to the year. Even though December was muted, 2024 was a very good year for market participants and if the trend continues 2025 will be rewarding as well. January was positive but also very “noisy.” January tends to be a pretty quiet period after the holiday blitz, and there were plenty of days when it was just that. But we also had volatility surrounding the presidential inauguration, the DeepSeek “crisis,” the Fed interest rate announcement, and several MAG7 earnings reports. It’s not always easy to do, but oftentimes the most productive and wise thing to do from an investment standpoint is to take a step back. When I saw a roaring bear on CNBC, that was my cue. I knew it was time to get back to the portfolios and indices and see if any underlying trends were being broken. They were not.

With that said, let’s take a look at the DeepSeek crisis and put aside the Fed and interest rates, earnings reports, and Washington shenanigans. At least that one we didn’t have on our Bingo card, and it seems a little interesting. Last Monday, tech stocks got hit hard, especially the mega-cap ones after a small Chinese company announced it used old Nvidia chips to develop an AI program better than ChatGPT. And they did it all for under $6 million (for comparison, Meta spent $30 billion on Nvidia chips last year.) To further the aggravation, they open sourced it, effectively telling anyone who cares how to do it too. Nvidia investors freaked out the most. After all, who’s going to need all those fancy new chips if a few old ones are all it takes? Keep in mind that US mega-cap tech stocks (including Nvidia) were underperformers for the last half of the year, so a disruption of some kind was already getting priced in. In the meantime, the broader market had been driven to all-time highs due to the rotation into financials, industrials, consumer discretionary, communications and lately healthcare and materials. (We’ve stated it here before, rotation is the lifeblood of bull markets and why diversification matters.) Also, we were witnessing strength abroad with the Euro STOXX 50 and German DAX closing at multi-decade highs. This is not what one sees when there’s a true crisis or panic underway. Alas, the financial markets seemed to be moving along orderly with healthy and positive trends still firmly in place, but was there indeed a bubble popping in AI and related companies?

Probably not (yet.) Firstly, a bubble would have to form for it to pop. There might be a little froth, but nothing like a true bubble. Nvidia, Meta, Google and the like have massive revenue streams with real return of capital to shareholders. Nvidia still makes the best chips and even if the cost comes down to run AI models this will only add to their demand, not contract it, since lower price points will drive explosive expansion as AI will be in everything going forward. Meta, Google, and others will have more competition but end up paying less for their wizardry. It’s true DeepSeek is a formidable upstart, but that is nothing new in the world of Silicon Valley and AI. This development should be good for innovation and good for the consumer.

As far as stocks go, none of the previous freak-outs over the past two years have turned out to be the beginning of any collapse. We continued to see higher lows and higher highs. The question is, will the mega-caps continue to lag as they have over the past six months, or will buyers step back in and make them leaders once again?

Wild 2024

Coming into 2024 most major banks and other prognosticators predicted the markets would decrease or remain around the same level after posting returns of 26% for the S&P and 54% for the Nasdaq in 2023. Yet here we are nearing 30% gains twelve months later. Increases of nearly 60% over a two-year period are rarely seen for the S&P 500 so we expect to hear similar muted predictions this year. And hopefully we do, because tops are made when bears get bullish. We’ll leave the forecasting to others and focus on items we can measure, like sentiment and price. But first let’s review a few things we experienced in 2024.

It was a wild year with interest rates, the election, cryptocurrencies, and FOMO. Bonds remained in a brutal bear market as interest rates refused to meaningfully fall. They’ve even been creeping up as the Fed’s been lowering. The inflation rate came well off its highs of 9% two years ago, but goods are still more expensive. In the last 5 years food prices have jumped nearly 30%, and going out to eat is becoming increasingly less appealing after seeing the bill. The election cycle was somehow even more wacky than predicted with Biden being forced out and major parts of Silicon Valley jumping behind Trump. Venture capital and tech tycoons now seemingly have more say than Goldman Sachs and Wall Street in the Republican party for the first time in memory. What that will actually mean for policy or the economy is anyone’s guess. Part of their support may have come due to their cryptocurrency interests. The Biden administration and the SEC have been slow to give guidance and support for Bitcoin and related assets causing some interested companies to look across the aisle. Consequently, since the election cryptocurrencies have rallied strongly. So much so that so-called “meme coins” have skyrocketed in value. People’s fear of missing out (FOMO) has driven things like Fartcoin (this is real) to over a billion-dollar valuation, making it worth more than 40% of all US companies. Crypto added $2 trillion in market-cap recently, but with all this zaniness going on it feels like $100 trillion in attention.

Twenty twenty-four was full of noise like this that served to scare some and excite others. It’s impossible to judge people’s motives for buying at one level and selling at another but we don’t have to, we just have to know what those levels are. Take one example, if the Dow stays above about 42,000 then the current uptrend is most likely intact as the math is showing plenty of buyers there. If it slips below that level things could get a little messy, but it still wouldn’t necessarily mean the party is over. Many more indicators would have to show downtrends. Despite the negativity displayed in the financial media over the past year, it is still impossible to have a bear market without stocks actually going down. The S&P 500, Dow Jones, and Nasdaq all closed at their highest levels in history last month and were up around 24% for the full year. The trend here for stocks is definitely not down despite the recent volatility. We’re also right in the middle of the most bullish 3-month period of the calendar and sector rotation is continuing to drive prices higher.

It takes two sides to make a market, and in 2024 even more than other years, the sell-side permabears voiced their pessimism promising recessions and crises daily. For this we are very thankful because they have kept a lid on the greedy animal instincts that cause markets to soar and pop and allowed us market participants to profit in an orderly fashion while the skittish remain on the sideline waiting for the next shoe to drop. Hopefully the muted 2025 expectations remain muted so this bull can keep marching on through the new year.

Bull Confirmation

Bull market trends are firmly in place. Despite talks of tariff wars, ballooning debt, and inverted yield curves, the market has surged higher. In one of the strongest years of the past century, the S&P has returned around 25% so far. Sometimes it can be difficult to see the true signals through all the noise. But as market participants we welcome the noisy doom-and-gloom crowd because that means we are not in a speculative bubble. The price action we have seen in stocks since the election is likely a reaction to shaking off uncertainty and refocusing on fundamental trends that were already in place. For example, the relative strength in the industrial and financial sectors has been evident for most of the year. This is the lifeblood of the economy. Technology has actually taken a backseat over the last six months and was down in the third quarter when almost every other sector was up. It is true that technology is the leader during bull markets more often than they aren’t. But it is also true that no significant bull market or sustained period of economic expansion can exist in the absence of healthy industrial and financial sectors. The strength in these areas not only reflect good times now but also historically predict positive returns looking out several quarters.

As discussed before, sector rotation is an integral part of a sustained bull market. As a leader falls out of favor it’s necessary for another group to grab the reins and push on. We are seeing exactly that as more and more stocks and sectors participate in the uptrend. Small cap stocks weren’t working before, now they are. Transportation stocks weren’t working before, now they are. Consumer discretionary wasn’t working before, now it is. If you go back and look at previous bull markets, you will notice that the longest running ones take place when underperforming sectors step up and become leaders at some point in the run. Most recently the transportation sector fits the bill perfectly. They have been stuck below their prior cycle highs due to worries of impending economic slowdown or recession. But now (though still lagging on the year) ride sharing companies, railroads, and airlines are all taking off. With so many areas just getting started and breaking above levels not seen in three years, the path of least resistance appears to be higher.

Another confirming piece of evidence of a bull market, and along the same lines of sector rotation, is the rotation into areas that one might think should not be garnering investors’ attention. Solar, for example. When one thinks of Trump, renewable energy does not come to mind. And when he was elected solar stocks tanked, as would be expected. However, over the past few weeks we have seen a trend reversal and buyers taking control. This does not happen in bear markets. In sideways and bear markets laggards get punished, often severely so. Getting solar back to its prior cycle highs would take a monstrous move as the industry as a group is down over 70% from the peak. While we don’t anticipate new all-time highs anytime soon, it is a very welcome sign for the markets as a whole that even solar is finding a way to push higher.

Elections and Seasonal Trends

Readers may recall the market letter from this time last year about seasonality. It discussed average returns during different times of the year and how this period, November through January, is typically the best. Last year the S&P 500 was up nearly 17% over those three months. This year, in addition to normal seasonality we also have the election cycle to overlay, which since 1954 has demonstrated average positive post-election returns of 5.6% over the ensuing 3 months and 8.6% after 6 months. Usually, September and October are challenging for investors and come with “October Surprises” and market sell-offs and even market crashes like in 1907, 1929, 1987, and 2007. Traders have been bracing for a market correction for many weeks now. In September we got a steep but very brief sell-off of around 6%, but the indices managed to fully recover and actually posted gains in both September and October. Objectively, this is a positive development, but it brings with it some anxiety. If stocks didn’t go down during the historically worst period of the year, what will they do when they should be going up, continue to march higher or take a breather?

Historically when markets show strength during otherwise tough times that is a very positive signal. So, bucking the lackluster autumn trend in favor of positive market performance should bode well. There is an old axiom on Wall Street, “buy in October and get yourself sober.” This strategy is referring to both buying during weakness and buying ahead of the year-end rally (i.e. put your worries aside and the bottle down and make some money.) We can’t know for certain what is driving markets higher this time around, but a plausible explanation could be the election. Markets don’t like uncertainty much more than they don’t like any single political party. In fact, the stock market has performed its best when there is a Democratic president and a Republican congress. All spring and summer volatility was relatively low and the markets were chugging along. Then Biden dropped out and volatility spiked to its highest levels of the year. Stocks sold off roughly 10% before bottoming a few weeks later. Calm returned to the markets at roughly the same time polls were showing the Democrats leading in the presidential race. Then in September polling started switching in favor of the Republicans taking the White House and there was another spike in volatility and a sell-off in the markets. Calm returned again and since then the S&P has moved sideways to higher.

So, where does that leave us as investors and money allocators? We don’t position our portfolios according to seasonal tendencies alone or simply who will sit in the Oval Office. We have to look at the totality of data points. And the current evidence indicates that we are in a strong and healthy bull market. This is a market that’s solidly up on the year, bucking seasonal trends, expanding breadth (more stocks going up than going down), and booking robust earnings from the dominant market leaders (GOOG, AMZN, AAPL, NVDA, TSLA). The main element that could put a halt to the bull run is the election. There almost certainly will be increased volatility in the coming weeks (as seen today.) One could almost think of the election as a giant earnings report. When a company posts earnings the stock will often move greatly in one direction or the other. Usually, the move is not exactly dependent on whether the report was good or bad but rather if it was unexpectedly good or bad. Traders will also typically “buy the rumor and sell the news.” This means that rumors of some good development or product can cause traders to bid the price higher only to see it fall again once that product is officially announced or actualized. Perhaps this is what we will see with the election. If one candidate winning is already “baked in” to the markets, we could see a sell-off if the expected takes place. Or we could see selling pressure arise from an unexpected or undesirable outcome. Either way we will be cautious over the next several weeks even if we believe this bull market is healthy and still has legs to run.

Fed Normalization

As we enter the fourth quarter in the markets, we do so on the back of a policy shift by the Federal Reserve. September turned out to be a strong month for US equities as the S&P advanced by about 2.5%. The Nasdaq also advanced but the tech-heavy index is still sitting below its highs made in July as uncertainty remains, especially with the looming elections. The broad advancement by stocks was spurred by changes in Fed policy as Chairman Powell announced a 50 basis point (0.5%) interest rate cut and guided for an additional 50bp cut before year-end. The Fed felt that inflation had cooled enough to allow them to focus on the other aspect of their mandate, full employment. Price stability and full employment for the American worker are the two directives given to the Federal Reserve. Powell repeatedly described the policy move as a “recalibration,” noting “slowed” job gains and “confidence that inflation is moving sustainably towards 2%.” This normalization of Fed policy is in contrast to the aggressive rate hikes we saw over the past few years to beat back inflation. A battle that has largely been successful. The markets are now predicting a further 50bp cut (as hinted by the Fed) this year, then a 1% cut in 2025, and a further 50bp cut in 2026. At that point the Fed believes they will have reached “neutrality,” meaning interest rates are neither accelerating nor restricting the economy.

A move toward neutrality is also known as policy normalization. And now that normalization has begun with more rate cuts coming, this should bode well for consumers as borrowing rates come down and access to credit increases. The Fed is in a difficult position because easing rates too aggressively to boost the economy can backfire in two different ways. One is that it can reignite inflation; and secondly it can actually decrease confidence by stoking recession fears. Investors will think something bad must be in the tea leaves if the Fed is trying to juice the economy. This is most likely why in response to the rate decision markets saw mixed price action. Nevertheless, this policy action should bode well for both stocks and bonds giving the steady growth of the economy and lower inflation readings.

A key question for investors is when will industry embrace that we are in an economic expansion and position for higher demand? For the most part, industries other than tech are not beefing up their production capabilities out of a belief that the US consumer is tapped out, or that restrictive tariffs are soon coming. However, if demand does indeed pick up there could be a rush to upgrade production which could drive commodity and material prices higher. So far, commodity prices have remained relatively stable, but we have seen a notable uptick in the performance of industrial and material stock prices. Perhaps there is already a change afoot. This will be something we will be keeping an eye on in the near future.

A Tale of Two Companies

All the hype in the markets this past year has focused on Nvidia, culminating with Wednesday’s latest earnings announcement. This was being billed as the most important and anticipated earnings report ever. The CEO was even obliging requests to autograph women’s bosoms. They are a big deal. They provide over 90% of the microchips being purchased today – a clear leader in AI chip design and software. Their earnings have skyrocketed of late, grossing over $30 billion dollars in the last quarter. For perspective, a year and a half ago they were bringing in $5 billion a quarter. On top of that, their profit margins are around 70%, just unheard of for a manufacturer. This is real money, not dot-com hope and expectations. And they are returning that cash to investors in the form of dividends and stock buybacks.

Amazingly, over the last year-plus as the stock has tripled, they have actually gotten cheaper. From a fundamental value perspective, a buyer of Nvidia today is paying less for cash flow and earnings than they would have paid in the past. It trades at about 50 times earnings today, whereas that number was about 150x several quarters ago. It’s impossible to know when the music stops for Nvidia and the earnings multiple comes down, but at least we can count on the earnings to keep increasing on an absolute basis for the next several quarters. The five largest tech companies (Microsoft, Meta, Tesla, Google, and Amazon) plan to spend $200 billion on infrastructure and GPU chips this year and over $250 billion next year. A staggering 40% of all money spent by Microsoft and Meta goes directly to Nvidia. Google pushes 14% of their spending to Nvidia and the CEO recently stated that the risk of underinvesting in AI and processing is greater than overinvesting. So, look for Google to bump up their capital expenditure soon.

Few people predicted that Nvidia would dominate the chip industry in this way. The semiconductor industry is relatively mature with some large and storied competitive players like Intel, Taiwan Semiconductor, Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, Broadcom, and AMD to name a few. Betting on just one company a decade or two ago statistically would not have gone as well as owning all of them. However, skewing towards those that do well by their shareholders is generally a safer bet. Companies have two obligations with their cash, invest in future growth or return it to the shareholders. Nvidia has been doing that for years - even before their meteoric growth. Which takes us to another company that has done this better than anyone for decades.

While all the hype and cameras were on Nvidia and artificial intelligence processors, little old Warren Buffett and his Berkshire Hathaway crossed the trillion-dollar valuation mark with almost no fanfare at all. With Buffett at the helm of Berkshire they have not once issued a dividend. They reinvest all capital. Ostensibly, Berkshire Hathaway is an insurance company. They insure the insurers and collect a healthy premium to do so. With those premiums Buffett first looks to invest in his core businesses to create growth organically or via acquisition, and secondly looks to buy stock in other businesses in the public and private markets that he deems are undervalued (including his own stock). When he can’t find anything that looks fairly priced to him, he will invest in treasury bonds and the S&P 500 index like the rest of us.

There is no one way to make money in the stock market, but there are plenty of ways to lose it. At HWM we know that sticking with companies and funds that take care of the hard-earned cash raised from investors are worthy of investing in and sticking with. We can’t know exactly which direction a stock will go on any given day or quarter but staying away from the ones saddled with debt or poor track records of generating returns on investment, and staying with those growing or returning cash via dividends and stock buybacks has a healthy track record of success.   

Rotation and Volatility

The bull market is steadily moving along but now with renewed volatility. The rotation trade has picked up steam and major indices have experienced turbulence as large market movers give up ground to their smaller or more undervalued counterparts. Summer is often a tamer period for the markets with low volatility as many traders and retail investors go on vacation or are just generally less focused on their finances. For a while it looked like that would be the case this year as well. But over the past few weeks we have seen one of the most epic rotations and swings in market history. Small caps, which have been laggards for years relative to the mega-caps, have come out of the doldrums and raced almost 10% higher this month while the S&P is slightly negative. This included a 12-day span of 13% outperformance, the largest in history. This huge rotation has narrowed the S&P 500’s year-to-date lead over the Russell 2000 (small caps) from a peak of over 16% to less than 4%. And right alongside this reversal has been a shift from growth to value. Another example of why diversification matters.

In previous discussions we have written about the great run large cap growth and specifically tech have had since the Great Recession. And just a few weeks ago the ratio of Growth to Value on a total return basis hit its highest level since the dot-com bubble. Since then however, we have seen an 11% outperformance by value. The current small cap and value rotation is being led by regional banks, homebuilders, and energy companies. Regional banks for example were up nearly 20% for the month while Nvidia and semiconductors were down roughly 15% until the big rally today as the Fed kept rates unchanged. It’s important to keep in mind that swings and rotation are normal in a healthy bull market. It is not healthy to see one pocket of the market dominate forever. Also, regional banks doing well is a very good indicator that small businesses and consumers are in good shape. As we noted last month, consumer sentiment is low but that is a reflection of the impact inflation has had on the average household. People’s investment accounts and 401(k)s have been growing but at the same time the savings rate has decreased slightly over the past year. Even though the inflation rate has come down dramatically from over 9% a couple years ago to below 3% today, prices are still much higher, and many paychecks are not keeping up with the increases. Retail sales rose just 1.9% from a year ago and adjusting for inflation that is actually a decrease in spending of 1% from last year. Consumers are definitely tightening their belts.

The recent rotation out of the Magnificent 7 (Microsoft, Apple, Google, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, and Tesla) and into other areas has contributed to what’s called “breadth thrust,” another measure of a healthy market. The stock market is a “market of stocks” after all and the more stocks that are participating (or larger breadth) and doing well, the better the overall market. There’s an indicator called the “Advance-Decline line” that measures the difference between advancing stocks and declining ones. It has just reached a new 52-week high, the highest level of the current bull market and close to the highest level in history. So long as market internals like these remain positive, we will remain optimistic about future returns.

Market High Sentiment Low

The major indices are solidly higher this year and that seems to be making pundits nervous. The clamor is getting louder for a market correction. Maybe it’s the election cycle or maybe the summer heat, but whatever it is the news media are frustrated with the market exuberance. What often fails to be mentioned though is that we sort of already had a correction. The median stock is down this year, small cap stocks are also down, and consumer discretionary has been a laggard for months. Industrials broke out to new highs at the end of last year but have now been flat since March - as have financials. We’ve experienced a correction and now we are getting a rotation.

As discussed before, rotation is vital to a healthy bull market. And right now while sentiment is low, investors seem to be taking the guesswork out of it and simply pouring money back into the tech titans. Microsoft, Apple, Google, Nvidia, and Meta are all at or near all-time highs. While this bodes well for the bull market overall that might not be the case in the near-term. The Nasdaq, on a technical analysis basis, is nearing “extremely overbought” levels. It sounds scary, but in the past it hasn’t paid to bet against this signal. Extreme readings such as this are often followed by short-term weakness, but then continue their long-term uptrend. If we do see a near-term pullback in the indices and further sentiment deterioration, it will likely just be a continuation of the rotation process. This time out of tech and into other areas.

A potential winner of the next rotation are commodities. A few months ago, we saw cocoa scream higher, now orange juice is near highs, gold is hitting all-time highs, and copper is on the verge of a historic 13-year breakout. If commodities continue to show strength, the beneficiaries would likely be industrials, materials, and energy companies. A rotation out of the mega-cap leaders and into some of these smaller conglomerates may not be enough to drive the indices up at the same pace we have seen over the past year, but on the other hand last week we saw both Nvidia and Apple stumble and yet the S&P still closed higher for the third straight week, advancing 0.61%.

In a recent survey of investors, over 60% responded that they’re expecting a major market top sometime over the next three months. For those of us that have been through several market cycles, this is music to our ears. Seldom do markets top when people expect them to.

Tech Resilience

After a rough April and despite the tough close to end the month, tech stocks came clawing back and left industrials, small caps, and many other stocks in the dust during May. Non-tech stocks made their attempts but ultimately failed to recapture their former highs from March. And yet just few weeks ago Dow bulls were taking a victory lap as the index crossed the 40,000 mark for the first time in history. Since then, we have seen the Dow fall about 4.25%. The same can be said for other indices like the Russell 2000 (down 3.5%) and midcap index (down 3.25%). This is a normal fluctuation seen during a bull market, but we know market technicians will be keeping a keen eye on those March levels. Tech-heavy indices like the Nasdaq and S&P 500 are showing strength while industrials are failing to break above their former highs. For some industries, like energy, those former highs go all the way back to 2014, and a break above those levels could lead to pretty significant outperformance. But over the last few weeks, investors returned to favoring what has worked for them over the last decade, and that’s tech.

Technology companies have been outperforming essentially since the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. At that time energy made up the majority of the weighting in the S&P 500 but then started to steadily lose favor to computer companies and pharmaceuticals, including biotech. Over time, tech companies of all kinds continued to plod away and take a larger investor allocation percentage at the expense of other industries. However, the run we have seen in semiconductors in particular over the last few years has been anything but plodding. Semis are the backbone of the tech industry, and they are now on the verge of becoming the most dominant sector in the S&P, overtaking software. Nvidia is up more than 1,150% in the last 20 months and now makes up almost 6% of the S&P 500. The only two companies that are larger are Apple and Microsoft.

The strength and resilience we have seen in technology is not only lifting US markets like the Nasdaq and S&P, but also markets abroad. Historically, investors and money managers would allocate funds to emerging markets in order to increase their commodity exposure and potentially capture larger gains while taking on more risk in developing countries. Once a safe bet to beef up your oil and mining portfolio, now you getting about 22% technology in emerging market funds due to the growth of companies like Taiwan Semiconductor, Alibaba, and Samsung. In some regards this is great, but it also means things are getting more correlated. The rising tide of tech is currently lifting all ships, but it’s best to remain diversified. As Warren Buffett has said, when the tide goes out, you get to see who’s been swimming naked.